– Good morning,

Apologies for being a day late. To be completely honest, I forgot what day it was yesterday and didn’t realize until after dinner that I missed publishing a member post. Sorry about that!

Hope you all had great breaks. I for one am happy to be back at it.

On to the update:

Augur disputes

Disclosure, I hold a tiny bit of REP

In December, the creator of the Augur market for predicting which party controlled the House after the mid-terms reported that Republicans was the correct answer, despite Democrats winning the the majority. S/he justified this decision by saying that at the time of the market’s close, Republicans still had the majority. I wrote:

What happens now? REP holders are allowed to dispute this result starting next Wednesday, December 19th. The mechanics of the dispute phase (and all of Augur to be honest) are pretty complicated, but in short this is how it works:

  1. A market outcome is reported, that outcome becomes the “tentative outcome”
  2. REP holders are allowed to dispute the outcome
  3. If enough REP holders choose another outcome, that outcome becomes the “tentative outcome”
  4. Back to step 2 until nobody successfully disputes

This can go on for some time, as Robert Miller pointed out to me yesterday. A market on whether the weather was good during the Bastille Day parade was disputed fifteen times.

A month has passed and the market still has not resolved. After the initial decision of Republican, a successful dispute turned the decision to Democrat. Until another successful dispute turned it to Republican. And then Democrat, then Republican, and now we’re waiting for the next dispute window to open at which time I’d expect another successful dispute from Democrats. You can see the riveting sequence here.

Already a member? Read the full update here

Become a member to get posts like this

Support the site and get members-only benefits

Subscribe for $100 a year

or subscribe monthly for $12 a month


Members receive a members-only analysis each week that is timely and substantial. I've been asked to be more opinionated and responsive to current events, so I'll try to do that in this more private forum. If you want my critical take on what matters in the industry, you might enjoy these analyses.

You can see a sample of a members-only analysis here. And a list of all of them here. Don't take it from me, check out these tweets from members:

  • "@tonysheng's writing is the best out there and this is worth every penny" --Myles Snider, CEO of Aurora EOS
  • "Highly recommend signing up for a membership if you're full-time in crypto or passionate about the space" --Spencer Noon, Managing Partner at DTC Capital
  • "All signal, no noise" --Zach Segal, Product at Coinbase

Over time, I'd love to develop more benefits like transcripts of podcasts (maybe host my own), a members-only discussion forum, AMAs with industry leaders, and more.

Thank you. I hope you'll stick around.

–Tony

If you aren’t already familiar with my work, I write long-form analyses on building and investing in crypto, and the impact of crypto on society.

My readers include investors at Union Square Ventures, a16z, Village Global, Multicoin Capital, Scalar Capital, and Polychain and builders of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Zcash, EOS, Tezos, 0x, and Coinbase.

Some awfully nice things people have said:

Tony’s blog is one of the best hidden gems in crypto. The content is regularly some of the most insightful out there. I read every post with a fine toothed comb.

–Kyle Samani, Cofounder and Managing Partner, Multicoin Capital

Tony is one of the most insightful and independent writers in the space. His newsletter consistently provides original perspectives on crypto/blockchain fundamentals that inspire you to think more critically.

–Soona Amhaz, Cofounder and CEO, Token Daily

If you read one person’s writing in the space, make it Tony’s. Tony breaks down complicated crypto concepts and economic theories in ways that educate both the beginner and expert alike.

–Erik Torenberg, Cofounder and Partner, Village Global


Not a member? You're missing out.

Join thousands of crypto insiders who make reading my analyses a part of their weekly routine.

Subscribe for $100 a year

or subscribe monthly for $12 a month

Member updates

March 14, 2019

Ripple funding games is good for crypto (plus should have shorted Grin)

March 7, 2019

On the margin, Coinbase's Neutrino acquisition is pro privacy but your coins aren't fungible either way

March 1, 2019

Who cares if Coinbase lists XRP? (plus Facebook Coin)