There has been some buzz recently about Pixelmaster, a “million dollar homepage” style game built on EOS. Users can draw on a public canvas by buying pixels from one another. Additionally, Pixelmaster contains some economic incentives popularized by FOMO3D–a jackpot game on Ethereum.

I’ve watched the crypto games space closely for the last year and a half (and spend most of my time on what you might argue is a big crypto game or a platform of crypto games). I have a more blase perspective on these games than those breathlessly reporting record-setting jackpot sizes or those crying ponzi scheme.

On the one hand, I think it’s great to see experimentation around using economic games to bootstrap engagement. On the other, I’ve seen about a year and halfs worth of hyped and then slowly dying games trying similar things whether it’s with jackpots or NFT speculation.

I think something that sticks will emerge from this experimentation, but it’s not FOMO3D or Pixelmaster (or Cryptokitties). Barring substantial changes to the rules or an unexpected wave of users, both of these games will continuously see lower and lower engagement until they die.

Why? They are–at their core–greater fools games. Assuming a relatively fixed player base, greater-fools games churn fools and eventually die.

Already a member? Read the full update here

Become a member to get posts like this

Support the site and get members-only benefits

Subscribe for $100 a year

or subscribe monthly for $12 a month


Members receive a members-only analysis each week that is timely and substantial. I've been asked to be more opinionated and responsive to current events, so I'll try to do that in this more private forum. If you want my critical take on what matters in the industry, you might enjoy these analyses.

You can see a sample of a members-only analysis here. And a list of all of them here. Don't take it from me, check out these tweets from members:

  • "@tonysheng's writing is the best out there and this is worth every penny" --Myles Snider, CEO of Aurora EOS
  • "Highly recommend signing up for a membership if you're full-time in crypto or passionate about the space" --Spencer Noon, Managing Partner at DTC Capital
  • "All signal, no noise" --Zach Segal, Product at Coinbase

Over time, I'd love to develop more benefits like transcripts of podcasts (maybe host my own), a members-only discussion forum, AMAs with industry leaders, and more.

Thank you. I hope you'll stick around.

–Tony

If you aren’t already familiar with my work, I write long-form analyses on building and investing in crypto, and the impact of crypto on society.

My readers include investors at Union Square Ventures, a16z, Village Global, Multicoin Capital, Scalar Capital, and Polychain and builders of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Zcash, EOS, Tezos, 0x, and Coinbase.

Some awfully nice things people have said:

Tony’s blog is one of the best hidden gems in crypto. The content is regularly some of the most insightful out there. I read every post with a fine toothed comb.

–Kyle Samani, Cofounder and Managing Partner, Multicoin Capital

Tony is one of the most insightful and independent writers in the space. His newsletter consistently provides original perspectives on crypto/blockchain fundamentals that inspire you to think more critically.

–Soona Amhaz, Cofounder and CEO, Token Daily

If you read one person’s writing in the space, make it Tony’s. Tony breaks down complicated crypto concepts and economic theories in ways that educate both the beginner and expert alike.

–Erik Torenberg, Cofounder and Partner, Village Global


Not a member? You're missing out.

Join thousands of crypto insiders who make reading my analyses a part of their weekly routine.

Subscribe for $100 a year

or subscribe monthly for $12 a month

Member updates

December 13, 2018

Augur is a Keynesian Beauty Contest (plus Bitcoin, Basis)

December 5, 2018

How Tron wins (plus Erasure, BinanceChain)

November 28, 2018

DLTs not Cryptocurrencies?